The curricular aspects form the foundation of any educational institution. However, the responsibilities of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) differ based on their administrative status. Affiliated Colleges, dependent on larger bodies like universities, mainly focus on implementing curricula. Their involvement in curriculum development, assessment procedures, and certification is peripheral. In contrast, universities have the mandate to design, revise, and define programme outcomes.
Criterion I pertains to an institution’s practices in offering a diverse range of programmes and courses aligned with national and global trends while meeting local needs. It evaluates aspects like diversity, academic flexibility, career orientation, multi-skill development, feedback systems, and stakeholder involvement in curriculum updates.
The focus of Criterion I is captured in the following Key Indicators:
KEY INDICATORS 1.1 Curriculum Planning and Implementation 1.2 Academic Flexibility 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment 1.4 Feedback System
1.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation
Affiliated/Constituent Colleges play a limited role in curriculum development. They adopt university-provided curriculum overviews and implement them in unique ways. This individualization reflects the institution’s values and concerns.
1.2 Academic Flexibility
Academic flexibility refers to freedom in course timeframes, horizontal mobility, interdisciplinary options, and enrichment programmes. Credit systems and curriculum choices are considered, adding to academic flexibility.
1.3 Curriculum Enrichment
Curriculum aims for holistic student development. Alongside dynamic curricular inputs, institutions should offer additional courses that sensitize students to contemporary issues like gender, environment, ethics, and creativity. Progressive universities provide diverse “value-added” courses.
1.4 Feedback System
Curriculum revision relies on stakeholder feedback. Institutions collect feedback to enhance curriculum relevance, addressing societal, economic, and environmental needs. Active feedback analysis improves learning effectiveness.